Jack in the Box vs BurgerFi: Which Franchise Is Best?
Choosing between a Jack in the Box or BurgerFi franchise comes down to more than just burgers—it’s about market availability, investment structure,...
3 min read
Dustin Thompson Updated on January 13, 2026
Converting an existing restaurant space ("second generation") typically offers faster speed-to-market and lower initial construction costs due to existing infrastructure. However, new builds ("greenfield") provide superior layout efficiency and brand customization, avoiding the potential hidden repair costs of older buildings.
Converting an existing restaurant generally saves some upfront costs and reduces construction time by months compared to a new build. However, new builds offer complete control over brand standards and workflow efficiency that conversions often compromise. The common misconception is that conversions are cheaper but anyone in the business knows that is far from true. Some second generation spaces are so badly deteriorated or need such costly repairs that a raze and rebuild might be a better option.
For franchise partners, the site selection phase is critical. You are often faced with a choice: lease or buy a space that was previously a restaurant (known as Second Generation or "2nd Gen") or build a new space from scratch (known as a New Build, "Greenfield," or "Vanilla Shell").
Both paths have distinct financial and operational implications. Understanding these nuances is essential for your ROI and long-term success.
This option involves taking over a space that was previously occupied by a food service tenant but not always. Many different building types can be converted but you must understand the costs to convert a non-restaurant building as much as building that was a restaurant. Something else you would want to consider is permitting and how that is impacted by each building type.
This involves leasing an existing space or buying a raw space, often in a new development, where you are the first tenant.
| Feature | Second Gen (Conversion) | New Build (Ground Up) |
| Typical Cost | Moderate-High | High |
| Permitting | Faster (Use is established) | Slower (Full review Required) |
| Design Risk | Layout compromises | Optimized design |
| Unforeseen Costs | High (Hidden damage) | Low (Predictable scope) |
Before signing a lease, engage a construction manager or GC to walk the site.
If your goal is to open quickly with a tighter initial budget, a second-generation conversion is often the smart play. It allows you to leverage existing capital improvements.
However, if you are well-capitalized and prioritizing long-term operational perfection over immediate speed, a new build ensures your restaurant operates exactly as the franchise model intends
.png?width=450&height=100&name=Inquire%20Now%20(450%20x%20100%20px).png)
Submit the form below to begin your franchising journey with Jack in the Box!
Choosing between a Jack in the Box or BurgerFi franchise comes down to more than just burgers—it’s about market availability, investment structure,...
Article Summary So is a legacy fast food franchise better than an emerging brand? Neither is objectively better; the right choice depends entirely on...
When it comes to 24/7 operations, Jack in the Box understands that an all-day mindset has numerous benefits to restaurant franchise owners.